Arsenal: Is this Arteta’s very own Kane?

When Mikel Arteta decided to alienate Pierre Emerick-Aubameyang from the Arsenal squad, he took the boldest decision of his managerial career yet.

This is not a coach who is afraid to make a bold call, also sending the likes of Mesut Ozil packing during his short time in north London. However, both decisions have seen the Gunners come out the other side a better team.

Martin Odegaard has settled in extremely well in England as his natural heir behind the striker, with only Trent Alexander-Arnold creating more chances than the Norwegian midfielder since the back end of November.

Meanwhile, since Aubameyang was given the freedom to join Barcelona, Arsenal are one of the most in-form sides in Europe.

Although Arteta’s men were given a reality check against Liverpool on Wednesday evening, their hopes of qualifying for next season’s Champions League is still in their hands.

They have two games in hand but there is a sense that their top-four hopes rest on how clinical they can be.

That’s where the Aubameyang topic becomes a bit controversial. Without their former captain, they do lack a cutting edge up top and after missing out on Dusan Vlahovic in January, a big opportunity to strengthen got away from them.

Yet, in Alexandre Lacazette, they have a player who is proving to be a pivotal cog in Arteta’s well-oiled machine. In the words of Albert Sambi-Lokonga, he has been “bringing the fire” to the team ahead of a crucial stage of the campaign.

The Frenchman has only scored twice in his last 11 Premier League fixtures but in that time has registered seven assists. That makes the Arsenal skipper the joint sixth-most creative player in the top-flight this season, showing that he does offer plenty to the team.

Indeed, strikers who give more of a creative threat have been all the range over the last few seasons with Roberto Firmino making a living out of being the supply line to Mo Salah and Sadio Mane.

Parallels can easily be drawn between the Brazilian and Lacazette who is so often the man that the likes of Bukayo Saka, Gabriel Martinelli and Emile Smith Rowe look to in order to feed them chances.

Speaking about the 30-year-old following the club’s 2-0 win over Leicester last weekend, Sky Sports pundit Jamie Redknapp went as far as to compare him to Harry Kane’s playstyle too.

Redknapp concluded: “Sometimes you just need that player to show and bring people in to play, but it only works if you have pace going the other way because Lacazette does not have that.”

Although the former Lyon attacker lacks the same cutting edge he had in front of goal before joining Arsenal, he still offers plenty and should Arteta’s team clinch top four in May, he will have played a vital part.

Compared to players in the same position across Europe’s top five leagues in the last year, Lacazette ranks in the top 5% for assists per 90 (0.33), the top 10% for shot-creating actions (3.36), the top 14% for through balls per 90 (0.19) and in the top 13% for successful pressures (29.7%).

What that tells us is that the £46.5m signing provides the side with an awful lot more than just goals, something that is difficult to replace and ultimately why Aubameyang received the axe.

Kane is quite clearly the better centre forward but when comparing the numbers mentioned above, Arsenal’s number 9 performs more shot-creating actions and applies more successful pressures of the ball per 90 minutes than the Spurs striker.

Lacazette also makes more passes that lead to a shot (1.43 per 90) and completes more passes into the 18-yard box over the same period of time than Kane.

Therefore, the only areas that let Arsenal’s main striker down is, of course, his finishing and ability to progress play when running with the ball.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Once upon a time, an attacker was paid simply to put the ball in the back of the net but if modern football has taught us anything, it’s that every position on the pitch is constantly changing.

To be a goalkeeper you now need to pass well, to be a full-back you need to have good technical ability and possess the quality to put the ball in the box, and as a striker, you need to be able to link the play, something the likes of Kane and Firmino do perfectly.

Lacazette too has benefitted enormously from the changing nature of modern football but at the same time, his lack of natural instinct inside the penalty area could well cost him his place at the Emirates.

His contract expires at the end of the season and despite his efforts, it would be a surprise if either party deemed him staying on as the correct verdict.

As much as his hold up play and creativity benefits Arsenal, they need someone who can also score consistently.

AND in other news, Signed for £30m, now worth £59m: Edu struck gold on “incredible” £79k-p/w AFC “baller”…

Suarez reopens race row

Liverpool forward Luis Suarez has again commented on his suspension for racism from last season, refusing to forget the incident.

The Uruguay international was given an eight-match ban after being found guilty of racially abusing Manchester United defender Patrice Evra, but has once more claimed his innocence.

“The suspension, I suppose, you could call strange and unbelievable,” the South American is quoted as saying in The Guardian.

“Without a single shred of proof, they suspended me. I accepted it without saying anything obviously because they could have made the suspension longer and it would have just made the whole thing continue, but my conscience is completely calm, and so is that of the club and my family.

“There was not a single convincing proof that I had done any of the things they accused me of doing. I am very calm about all of it.

“I have played all my childhood and everyone knows that in Uruguay there is a huge black population. I had team-mates and friends of both colours all the time in the national team, in Liverpool, in Holland, where the majority [of players] are from Surinam, and I never had any problem with them.

“Holland is one of the countries in the world where there is the highest number of black players and at no point was there an issue.

“Well, these are the things about football. It seems to me that they had to get rid of a Liverpool player and, well, they definitely were gratified by all of this,” he concluded.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Winning the derby is now more important

On Sunday the unstoppable force will meet the immovable object in a clash of the titans at Old Trafford. When the Premier League’s top two clash it is a massive game whoever they may be but when the game is also a Manchester derby it is bound to be a battle of epic proportions.

There is no doubt that both managers want to win this game with the winner claiming top spot but Sir Alex Ferguson still believes that the biggest game in football is Manchester United v Liverpool, claiming that he has always “considered it to be the game of the season in English football”.

And despite his vast experience as a manager and unquestionable success, it is difficult to see why he thinks this Sunday’s game is not the biggest match of the year.

Roberto Mancini’s sit top of the tree having only dropped two points so far as their free-flowing attacking football lives up to the high expectations put on the star-studded side. While in recent years the signings made by Mancini and those before him have resembled a kid in a sweet shop, this summer has seen some very shrewd buys with top transfer Sergio Aguero making a bigger impact than anybody could have imagined, looking like a world-class player and making Carlos Tevez throw a tantrum in order to get noticed.

At the same time the arrival of Samir Nasri from Arsenal has allowed David Silva more freedom behind Aguero to weave his magic, while Clichy and Savic have given the Italian even more strong defensive options at a club that doesn’t concede many goals and Owen Hargreaves will give them the vital knowledge of how to win big trophies.

These additions have meant that the side Fergie’s men will come be facing is stronger than anything that City have ever had at their disposal and as the Blue half of Manchester look to claim only their second victory in the league at the Theatre of Dreams since 1975 and go five points clear at the top of the Premier League.

If City cross into the red half of Manchester and come away with victory, not only will they prove that they are capable of beating the big teams but it will send a message that they are ready to take over the mantle as the country’s biggest club from their closest foe. And it is this matter that makes this the biggest game of the season.

When a young Alex Ferguson trotted into the offices of Old Trafford his mission was to end the dominance of Liverpool who won trophy and trophy in the 70’s and 80’s. This instantly reignited the ferocious relationship between the sides that has lasted the past quarter of a century and although it took time, 12 Premier League titles later his side have now become the figurehead of the league while Liverpool have fallen into the depths of anonymity, living on their history to maintain a space in the footballing limelight.

Any match between Manchester United and Liverpool is massive because they are the two most successful clubs in the history of the English game and that rivalry will always remain but it is no longer a championship deciding battle. The title threat from the Merseysiders is now non-existent and despite the enthusiasm that surrounded the club after Dalglish’s appointed in January, the only thing that will enter the Liverpool trophy cabinet this season is dust.

They have been trophyless since 2006 and are shrinking more and more in their stature with the departures of big players such as Fernando Torres and Xabi Alonso suggesting they are becoming a selling club and the overpriced purchases of Downing, Henderson and Carroll highlighting their desperation to cling on to the tails of the big teams. The only thing preventing total meltdown at Anfield is the support, which backs its team to the hill. Last weekends the home fans were more influential than the preverbial 12th man and spurred their team to a draw. Without that backing the side would be dwindling around the relegation zone as it was under Roy Hodgson.

While Liverpool have been falling City have been rising and our now in a position where victory over United could see them become the head of English football for the next 20 years. The Manchester derby has not been this big in a long time with City often fighting battles at the other end of the table to the Reds but the teams are now closer than ever and it is up to Sir Alex to take this threat seriously if they want to return to the top.

Although they come into the game as underdogs, Mancini has guided his team to victory over United in the League Cup and most recently in the FA Cup semi-final on the way to ending the club’s 35-year wait for a trophy. With one piece of silverware in the bag they are hungry for more and although Sunday’s game won’t decide the title race, it will be the clearest sign so far which half of Manchester may be celebrating in May.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Liverpool versus United will always be a big game. History, traditional and the rivalry between fans will never burn out. But there is a noisy new kid on the block and on Sunday we will see why the Manchester derby is now the biggest game in English football.

If you want to talk about this topic or anything else to do with sport leave a comment below or follow me on Twitter @jrobbins1991.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

Rooney fit to face Benfica

Manchester United striker Wayne Rooney has shaken off a knock to be fit to play against Benfica on Tuesday night, in what is a crucial match for the Premier League champions.

Sir Alex Ferguson’s men are locked on eight points with the Portuguese giants, and a win at Old Trafford would put the English side in pole position to top Champions League Group C.

With Danny Welbeck doubtful and Chris Smalling out, Ferguson has received a boost by Rooney declaring his fitness.

“Wayne Rooney got a few knocks and missed training, but he should be OK for Tuesday,” the Scottish coach told Sky Sports.

“We’ve got one or two knocks from Saturday. Jonny Evans got a little tightness in his hamstring yesterday, but hopefully will be OK.

“Chris Smalling trained but won’t be available, but he should be OK for Saturday,” he stated.

Ferguson was under no illusions to how important the game is for United’s progression hopes, and has targeted three points.

“It’s a big game. It’s a game which we recognise is a real European game in the history of Benfica and ourselves.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

“It’s a really interesting game for both teams. Both will want to win so it should be an open match and hopefully we will get the result we want,” he concluded.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’writer-1′ align=’right’]

Al Fayed slams Mark Hughes

Fulham owner Mohamed Al Fayed has criticised former boss Mark Hughes, calling the Welsh coach ‘an odd man’ and stating he has lost his spark.

Hughes surprisingly left Craven Cottage in the summer after stating he was not happy at the club, and recently slated the London outfit for lack of ambition.

The Egyptian businessman has hit back however in damning fashion.

“What a strange man Mark Hughes is,” an open letter revealed in The Telegraph reads.

“Sacked by Manchester City, he was becoming a forgotten man when I rescued him to become manager of Fulham Football Club.

”Even when results were bad, I did not put pressure on him. I gave him every support – financial, moral and personal. He received everything he asked for and more.

”He fully negotiated a two-year extension to his contract.

”On the day he was due to sign, he walked out without the courtesy of a proper explanation for such capricious and potentially damaging conduct.

”And now he insults the club that saved his career, claiming it lacks ambition and he insults the players as too old, even though they delivered an eighth position finish last season and a place in the Europa League.

”He is not just disrespectful but entirely wrong.

”Fulham has just announced plans for a splendid new riverside stand that will substantially increase the capacity of Craven Cottage.

”The playing squad has been strengthened with many fine young players and Fulham is progressing in every way, with an outstanding manager in Martin Jol, the man we really wanted when Hughes was appointed.

”Fulham will endeavour to prosper without him simply because, when the challenge came, Mark Hughes lacked the courage and commitment to take on the task of leadership.

”If people are looking for a flop, they only have to no further than the man who has lost his spark.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

“If ever there was a man [who] lost his spark, I fear it is Mark. I would feel sorry for him had he not acted so dishonourably,” it concluded.

Hughes has been out of the game since leaving the Cottagers in the summer, but is one of the favourites for the vacant Leicester City post.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’writer-1′ align=’right’]

Hargreaves must shake off the ‘cheap option’ label

One of the biggest shocks of the culmination of the transfer window was injury-plagued Owen Hargreaves’ move across to the blue half of Manchester. Having played just four times in three seasons for Manchester United, questions arose as to why Manchester City would take such a gamble on the midfielder. Since the conclusion of the contract, City boss Roberto Mancini has openly stated that the club only signed Hargreaves because he was a ‘cheap option’, which is not exactly inspirational news for the player to hear. So how should Hargreaves react to this confidence shattering statement?

After City’s summer of enormous spending and in light of Fifa’s financial fair play regulations, the club stated that they had no money to buy any more players, and would have to work with loan or free deals. Hargreaves provided the perfect bargain option for City, who promptly announced that they only brought the former England international in because they couldn’t afford Fernando Gago or Daniele De Rossi.

To find out that you’re somebody’s third choice, and have only been signed as a ‘cheaper option’, is not really what anyone wants to hear. Although Manchester City also praised Hargreaves’ quality, their statement just seems utterly baffling. For a player so short on matches and fitness, his confidence must be extremely brittle, and stating this in public is downright stupid, and poor man-management by Mancini.

[ad_pod id=’vip-2′ align=’centre’]

There is no doubt that Hargreaves is a quality player, and that he will provide strength in depth for City over a busy season for them. He gives Mancini a different option in the centre of the field, and will provide excellent back up for starting anchormen Nigel De Jong and Yaya Toure. However, in order to get the best out of Hargreaves, City need him physically fit, and more importantly, mentally strong. For someone with dented confidence after his persistent injury problems, and lack of a new offer from Manchester United, this is hardly the kind of statement that will inspire him to great things.

What Hargreaves has to do now, is prove Mancini wrong, and shake off the ‘cheap option’ label. He has to use the rather disrespectful statement to inspire him to perform to his highest standard, proving that he is much more than just a bargain replacement. He has to turn the statement into a positive and use it to achieve his best level. Perhaps it will even bring out the best in him, and prove to be a cunning master-stroke from Mancini. It is all about how Hargreaves reacts to it, and how he deals with it, whether in a positive or a negative way.

Certainly Hargreaves has enormous mental strength and resolve to have recovered and battled back from serious injury problems. However, the amount of time he has spent off the field is enough for little doubts to have crept into his mind. He bears the scars of the past, and is probably quite fragile right now, so statements like this and his omission from the Champions League squad are hardly going to inspire him to great things at City.

How do you think Owen Hargreaves should react to being labelled the ‘cheap option’ at Man City? Let me know your thoughts below or follow me on Twitter @LaurenRutter for more comment and debate.

[divider]

Fancy a Premier League Box Experience? Click on banner below to find out more

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

[divider]

Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain backed for inclusion

Arsenal manager Arsene Wenger has stated that he has to be careful with young superstar Alex Oxlade-Chamberlain, but believes the winger should be in England’s Euro 2012 squad.

The wideman has impressed since moving to north London from Southampton, with many surprised that he was not included in The Three Lions squad to face Netherlands in an international friendly on Wednesday night.

Despite this, Wenger feels Oxlade-Chamberlian could feature in Poland and Ukraine this summer.

“Physically we have to monitor him because after every game he can have a little problem,” he told the club’s official website.

“We know now that a large percentage of players who play a lot of games between the ages of 18 and 21 have bony stress responses. I never expected the number to be so high.

“[It happens] because your skeleton is not completely finished and the bones are not completely developed to absorb the kinds of shocks you get in the Premier League.

“We have to be cautious about that. But you are always in a trap when the player is as good as he is, like Jack Wilshere is too.

“You cannot take him out of the team, you have to keep him there. They can win you games.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

“Until the end of the season there is no problem and if he continues to play like this I am convinced he will go to Euro 2012,” Wenger concluded.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’dfp-mpu’ align=’right’]

The right punishment to fit the crime

So the inevitable happened – Wayne Rooney has had his England ban reduced to two games, the third game ban suspended for four years.

As a Manchester City fan who considers Rooney to have fewer good points to his character than the love child of Piers Morgan and Kelvin Mackenzie (if such a thing were possible), as a football fan who has fallen out of love with the England team and its surrounding circus over the past few years, you wouldn’t expect me to be happy with the decision, or be supportive towards the decision.

After all, no one could argue the red card wasn’t deserved. Rooney kicked out needlessly at another player, it was violent conduct, and that’s a three-match ban the world over – or so I thought.

And he’s got form. A player whose red mist has let down club and country before, a player whose suspect temperament always hinted at a disciplinary nightmare round the corner.

So three matches is surely fair? Well maybe not. UEFA disciplinary procedures are different to the FA’s, so you can’t really compare the two. A whole host of journalists are claiming now the FA have set a terrible precedent by appealing Rooney’s ban and that they will now be open to appeals every time a player is given a 3-match ban. But they miss the fact that the two organisations run different disciplinary procedures, due to the different nature of domestic and international football. There is no set three-match ban for this sort of offence with UEFA – they have disciplinary panels that assess bans, and can reduce them – as they did with Rooney, and as they have done before with other players.

Already managers are moaning too, Kenny Dalglish being the first to also predict clubs contesting domestic three games bans. The FA will quite rightly point out that their bans run under a different organisation, under a different process, and thus there is no comparison to be made.  The constant flow of club football demands a different process, a different rule-book.

I don’t know what argument the FA took in the appeal, as they have no intention of revealing such information, though they will have definitely cited the example of Andrei Arshavin, who had his ban reduced to two games in similar circumstances prior to Euro 2008. Either way, despite everything, I agree with the FA’s stance, and I agree with the length of ban, if not the way it was eventually decided.

My main argument is straight-forward, if not necessarily a very popular one. It is that having similar punishments for domestic and international games is not fair. A three match domestic ban has far less impact than a three match international ban. Domestically, a player might be out of action for a fortnight. An international ban can leave a player in the wilderness for a large chunk of a year, and as we saw with Rooney, could wipe out participation in a whole tournament. This doesn’t seem fair to me, and punishments should be more proportional. Yes, getting a ban just prior to the finals of a tournament could be seen as bad luck (or timing), just as getting banned for an FA Cup final would be, but getting banned for three matches during a qualification campaign would still see you off international duties for up to half a year (for games of consequence at least). The FA have invited criticism by appealing Rooney’s ban, as they seem to condone violent conduct, going against everything they preach about “fair play” on the pitch. But if they hadn’t appealed, they would have been slammed in the press anyway. Any FA would have appealed, as it was in their interest, and the fans’ interest to do so. After all, even the player Rooney kicked thought the ban was too harsh.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

Rooney was stupid to kick out at the opposition player, as he has been stupid many times before. He cannot bemoan the red card he got, and he cannot bemoan a suspension – but three matches was too harsh in my opinion – the route to getting it reduced may have been flawed, a route involving a campaign by our Football Association until they got their way, but the end result was fair. The length of a sporting ban, be it for violent conduct, accumulation of cards, taking a banned substance or pushing a referee to the ground, is not a set amount laid out in some magical rule book deep in the vaults of FIFA HQ. A ban should enforce the sufficient punishment for the crime committed. Rooney deserves no sympathy for his various misdemeanours, but missing what could be two-thirds of England’s Finals campaign is to me a punishment that fits the crime.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’left’]

McCarthy feels Wolves should have won

Wolves manager Mick McCarthy has stated that despite the fact that his side came back from a goal deficit twice against Norwich to draw 2-2, the home side should have won the game.

Andrew Surman and Simeon Jackson scored a goal in each half to give The Canaries the advantage, but Slyvain Ebanks-Blake and Ronald Zubar levelled things up for the Molineux outfit.

Despite Zubar’s goal coming eight minutes from the end, McCarthy feels his side had enough of the play to get three points instead of one.

“It was exciting, captivating and excruciating at times,” he told Sky Sports.

“They got off to a good start, we got back into it and were on top at the end of the first half.

“I think we dominated the second half and conceded against the run of play.

“If we get those chances, irrespective of the goals we’ve conceded, we have got to win the game.

“My players always give every ounce of effort. I love my players for that. It shows what they’re about, coming back from behind twice,” he concluded.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

By Gareth McKnight

[ad_pod id=’writer-1′ align=’right’]

Sandro pens new Tottenham deal

Tottenham midfielder Sandro has signed a new contract at White Hart Lane that will keep him at the club until July 2016.

The Brazil international impressed in his first season in England last term, and has been linked with a move to AC Milan and Roma.

Despite this, the South American has put pen to paper on a new deal that will keep him in North London for a further five years.

“The club is delighted to announce that Sandro has signed a new five-year contract which runs until 2016,” an announcement on the side’s official website read.

Sandro is currently recovering from a knee injury that he picked up whilst on international duty with Brazil during the Copa America.

Meanwhile, Chelsea boss Andre Villas Boas has stated that a January move for Spurs playmaker Luka Modric is unlikely.

The Croatia international was the subject of at least three bids from the Stamford Bridge outfit over the summer, with Spurs turning down a deadline day offer of £40million for the midfielder; the Chelsea boss believes their interest may end there.

FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast. FootballFanCast General Stay ahead in the world of football analysis, commentary, and fan insights with FootballFancast.


By subscribing, you agree to receive newsletter and marketing emails, and accept Valnet’s Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. You can unsubscribe anytime.

“No I don’t think so. The market is closed and I won’t speculate what happens in January,” he told Sky Sports News when asked about Modric’s future.

[ad_pod id=’unruly-2′ align=’right’]

Game
Register
Service
Bonus